News
Articles
Case Histories
Buyer's Guide
Career Center
April 2011
August 2011
Dealer Insight - September 2011
Dealer Insight April 2011
Dealer Insight August 2011
Dealer Insight February 2011
Dealer Insight January 2011
Dealer Insight July 2011
Dealer Insight June 2011
Dealer Insight March 2011
Dealer Insight May 2011
December 2011
eNews - December 2011
eNews - February 2012
eNews - January 2012
eNews - November 2011
eNews - October 2011
February 2011
February 2012
January 2011
January 2012
July 2011
June 2011
March 2011
May 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
Arsenic
Bottled Water
Disinfection
Membrane Filtration
Click here for a subscription to
Water Quality Products
Give us your feedback on our site.
Change your subscription info
Subscribe to our
WQP/WWD Executive News Summary e-Newsletter.
Sponsored by Water Quality Products (WQP)


LEARNMORE!
RSS: WQP Articles

 Related Articles
"Arsenic Drinking Water Standard Pending Revision"

"Going the Extra Mile for Quality"

"Part I: Project Offers Cost-Effective Solution to Meet New Arsenic MCL "

"The Total Package"

 Editorial Categories
  • Arsenic
  • Ion Exchange
  • Water Treatment

     Related Products
  • Resin Suppliers
  • Ion Exchange Equipment
  • Resins, Ion Exchange
  • Arsenic Removal

     Related Links
  • http://www.puroliteusa.com

     Share It
    "/popup_app/index.cfm?fuseaction=showEmailPageToAFriendForm&appDirectory=wqp&linkQueryString=fuseaction=showArticle*amp*articleID=7104&linkLabel=Freedom From Long-Term Liability" target="_new">   "/popup_app/index.cfm?fuseaction=showEmailPageToAFriendForm&appDirectory=wqp&linkQueryString=fuseaction=showArticle*amp*articleID=7104&linkLabel=Freedom From Long-Term Liability" target="_new">Email this Article to a Friend

    Share |

    Freedom From Long-Term Liability

       Terms & Conditions of Use


    Safe landfill disposal of spent arsenic removal media

    - By Francis Boodoo

    The new maximum contaminant level (MCL) of 10 ppb for arsenic in drinking water has stimulated the development of many new and innovative solutions. Granular iron-based adsorption media (GIMs) is one of the established technologies, with thousands of cubic feet of material installed at municipalities throughout the nation. After a single use, such arsenic-laden media is simply disposed of at landfills classified for the handling of non-hazardous materials. Some regulators are now questioning this practice, as research at the University of Arizona has demonstrated conclusively that granular iron media loaded with arsenic will leach arsenic, under landfill conditions, back into the surrounding landfill at hazardous concentrations.

    Hazardous Nightmare

    This means that several years from now, exhausted arsenic-laden granular media—once considered safe to dispose of as non-hazardous—may become a hazardous nightmare for everyone concerned. Such liability can potentially extend all the way back to the operator of the facility, the generator of the waste, and even to the manufacturer of the media.

    There is a particular quirk in the test used to determine the hazardous or non-hazardous nature of arsenic-bearing granular media that should be of general concern. The primary test used is called the Toxic Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP). Essentially, this test is designed to measure the concentrations of toxic contaminants that can be extracted from such materials when using a specified chemical solution and procedure. The extracted concentration of each contaminant is then compared with the maximum allowable concentration for each material, above which is classified as hazardous.

    In the case of arsenic, if the value exceeds 5 mg/L, the material is classified as hazardous and should be disposed of in a hazardous landfill. Such hazardous waste landfills are designed to operate with protective measures to prevent arsenic from getting back into the general environment.

    The issue with the current test for arsenic is that it uses an extractant solution with a pH of approximately 4.5. At this pH, arsenic is very tightly bound to iron, and therefore, a minimum of the arsenic is released into the extractant solution. Unfortunately, the pH conditions that exist in such landfills are quite different, with the pH ranging from 7 to 9, typically. At such pH, the binding power of iron for arsenic is greatly reduced. Chemically reducing conditions in landfills also convert the iron to a more soluble form, causing further separation of the arsenic from the iron. This means that a material classified as safe for disposal in a non-hazardous landfill can potentially leach arsenic into the surrounding landfill at concentrations that are above the hazardous level.

    Avoiding Liability

    Modifying the TLCP procedure to one more representative of environmental conditions existing in the landfills would be a first step toward correct classification of such media. Once this is done, arsenic-laden media of this type would then likely be more correctly classified as hazardous and would have to be disposed of in landfills that can accept such hazardous waste. This creates a dilemma for users, as the higher cost for disposal of the media as hazardous waste must ultimately be passed on to consumers.

    Fortunately, an innovative iron-based medium has been developed to solve this dilemma by providing a “landfill-safe” method of disposal of the spent media. The new Hybrid Media, made of ion exchange resin impregnated with nanoparticles of iron oxide, works equally as well as GIMs in removing arsenic from contaminated water and also offers the advantage of being regenerable. This means that before disposal, the arsenic-laden media can be readily stripped of arsenic content, and the arsenic-free media can be sent to a non-hazardous landfill for disposal.

    Overall costs of treating for arsenic can be kept to a minimum due to the extended life of the media versus GIMs. Regenerability results in at least a tenfold reduction in the volume of spent media going into the landfills. The arsenic stripped from the media can be concentrated into sludge by precipitation with ferric chloride and further encapsulated with special polymers to ensure it is impervious to leaching.

    While regulators are expected to take the time to study and incorporate the new landfill disposal knowledge into a modified TCLP test procedure, users, manufacturers and facility operators must now start to think of ways to protect themselves against such potential long-term liability.




    Francis Boodoo is technical sales manager for The Purolite Co. He can be reached at 610.668.9090, or by e-mail at fboodoo@ puroliteusa.com.

    References: 1. TCLP Underestimates Leaching of Arsenic from Solid Residuals Under Landfill Conditions – Amlan Ghosh, Muhammed Mukiibi and Wendell Ela – Dept. Of Chem. & Env. Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, Ariz. – Env. Sci. & Tech. 2004, 38, 4677- 4682 2. POU – POE Removal of Arsenic and Uranium with ArsenX-NP – Francis Boodoo, The Purolite Co., NGWA, February 2005

    Source: Water Quality Products   July 2006   Volume: 11 Number: 7
    Copyright © 2012 Scranton Gillette Communications




    Advertise with us
    Learn about our online marketing opportunities.
    Home   |   Advertising   |   News Search   |   Articles   |   Buyer's Guide   |   Career Center   |   Case Histories   |   Top of Page   |  
    Share |