News
Articles
Case Histories
Buyer's Guide
Career Center
April 2011
August 2011
Dealer Insight - September 2011
Dealer Insight April 2011
Dealer Insight August 2011
Dealer Insight February 2011
Dealer Insight January 2011
Dealer Insight July 2011
Dealer Insight June 2011
Dealer Insight March 2011
Dealer Insight May 2011
December 2011
eNews - December 2011
eNews - February 2012
eNews - January 2012
eNews - November 2011
eNews - October 2011
February 2011
February 2012
January 2011
January 2012
July 2011
June 2011
March 2011
May 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
Arsenic
Bottled Water
Disinfection
Membrane Filtration
Click here for a subscription to
Water Quality Products
Give us your feedback on our site.
Change your subscription info
Subscribe to our
WQP/WWD Executive News Summary e-Newsletter.
Sponsored by Water Quality Products (WQP)


LEARNMORE!
RSS: WQP Articles

 Related Articles
"Calcium Hypochlorite Tablet Chlorination: Fact or Fiction?"

"Coming Together"

"Meeting Potable Water Demands"

"Moving Forward"

"Ozone as a Disinfectant"

"Ozone Disinfection "

"Ozone Tackles Groundwater Contamination"

"The Important Role of Disinfectants "

"What's in the Water?"

 Editorial Categories
  • Ozone Disinfection
  • Ultraviolet
  • Water Treatment

     Related Products
  • Chlorine Testing Equipment
  • Ultraviolet (UV) Radiometers
  • Ozone Systems

     Related Links
  • Accent Control Systems

     Share It
    "/popup_app/index.cfm?fuseaction=showEmailPageToAFriendForm&appDirectory=wqp&linkQueryString=fuseaction=showArticle*amp*articleID=7744&linkLabel=The ABCs of Bacteria Removal" target="_new">   "/popup_app/index.cfm?fuseaction=showEmailPageToAFriendForm&appDirectory=wqp&linkQueryString=fuseaction=showArticle*amp*articleID=7744&linkLabel=The ABCs of Bacteria Removal" target="_new">Email this Article to a Friend

    Share |

    The ABCs of Bacteria Removal

       Terms & Conditions of Use


    Reviewing different methods of water purification

    - by Marianne Metzger

    Removing or inactivating bacteria in the water we drink is essential to protecting the health of any person drinking the water. Removing or inactivating bacteria in water can be done in a variety of ways, depending on the water source, level of bacteria and inorganic matter, and resources available. Many bacteria treatment systems involve the addition of a chemical to kill or inactivate, but bacteria can be removed physically by filtration or through the use of ultraviolet (UV) radiation. Each system has its pros and cons, so it is important to take everything into account when deciding on a method of removal. Once you have a system in place it is important to continually monitor the system to ensure ongoing removal of bacteria. Frequency of monitoring will depend on applicable regulations, type of system and resources available.

    Chemical Oxidation/Disinfection

    The most common method of bacteria removal is through the use of chlorine; in fact, about 98% of public water systems use some form of chlorine for disinfection. Chlorine is frequently used because it is inexpensive and effective. There are several forms of chlorine including chlorine gas, sodium hypochlorite and calcium hypochlorite. Chlorine gas is widely used in large municipal applications, while sodium hypochlorite is commonly used in residential and smaller system applictions. Calcium hypochlorite is a granular form of chlorine used frequently in swimming pools and spas.

    When chlorine is added to water two species are formed: hypochlorous acid, which is electrically neutral, and hypo-chlorite ion, which is electrically negative. Hypochlorous acid is a much stronger disinfectant and oxidizer than hypochlorite. The pH level determines how much hypochlorous acid and hypochlorite is formed. The lower the pH, the more hypochlorous acid is formed, while hypochlorite is formed at higher pH levels. This explains why measuring oxidation reduction potential (ORP) gives a better idea of disinfection than just measuring free chlorine. ORP actually measures the potential for oxidation by taking into account the difference in oxidizing power of the two chlorine species as well as the pH levels. Lowering the pH level will increase the ORP because the hypochlorous acid is a stronger oxidizer and much more prevalent at low pH levels. The Stage 1 Disinfectant and Disinfection Byproduct Rule, however, establishes maximum residual disinfectant levels for chlorine, chloramine and chlorine dioxide. This means systems are monitoring directly for these disinfectants to ensure they comply with the regulations.

    Chloramine

    Chloramine is a newer disinfectant that has emerged due to the formation of disinfection byproducts with traditional chlorine disinfection. Chloramine is the combination of chlorine and ammonia. Systems add the ammonia downstream of the chlorine injection site in order to allow the chloramine to form naturally. Chloramines can occur naturally if water already contains ammonia. Chloramines became an alternative to chlorine because they have a tendency to form fewer disinfection byproducts. The residual chloramine is more stable and longer lasting so it provides better protection against bacteria re-growth in systems with large tanks or dead ends. Chloramine does pose problems for fish aquariums as it is toxic to aquatic life and it is dangerous for dialysis applications. Chloramine is also more difficult to remove from water than chlorine.

    Chlorine Dioxide

    Chlorine dioxide is also gaining in popularity due to changes in regulations regarding disinfection byproducts. Chlorine dioxide has been used in water treatment for several decades as an oxidizer to aid in removal of iron, manganese and other odor-causing organic substances. Chlorine dioxide is effective over a broad pH and temperature range, and kills viruses and cysts like Cryptosporidium and Giardia that chlorine alone cannot kill effectively. It is commonly used as a pre-oxidant because it does not react with organic materials to form the byproducts such as trihalomethanes and haloacetic acids that chlorine does. It does form chlorite ions, however, which are regulated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) with an maximum contaminant level (MCL) of 1 ppm. Chlorine dioxide can be generated in either liquid or gaseous form. In the U.S., chlorine dioxide gas cannot be transported in any concentration, so it must be generated on site. There have been some recent advances in delivery of chlorine dioxide as a disinfectant, including generators, stabilized solutions, tablets, powders and sanitary wipes.

    Ozone & UV Treatment

    Ozone is a disinfectant that is commonly used in bottled water applications, industrial water treatment and food processing. It is becoming widely accepted in public water supplies as well as residential treatment due to its advantages over chlorine. One of the most important advantages is that like chlorine dioxide, ozone is extremely effective at killing parasites and other waterborne viruses that are resistant to chlorine. Ozone removes color and odors from water, while chlorine adds distinctive odor and taste. Ozone also does not form common disinfection byproducts like trihalomethanes or haloacetic acids; however, it can potentially form bromate if bromide is present in the water being treated. Bromate is considered a carcinogen and is regulated by the EPA under the SDWA with a MCL of 0.010 mg/L and a MCL goal of zero. Ozone is a gas and cannot be transported so it must be generated on site, either by corona discharge or UV radiation. Each system has its advantages, so consult with the manufacturers to determine your best option.

    UV light is also gaining in popularity due to studies indicating its efficiency, safety and cost-effectiveness. The American Water Works Association conducted a study that indicates use of UV light as a disinfectant does not produce any carcinogenic or mutagenic chloro-organic byproducts. Water travels through a disinfection chamber where it is exposed to UV radiation, which kills or inactivates bacteria, viruses and cysts without adding anything to the water. Water may require pretreatment to remove minerals because bacteria can hide behind mineral particulates and enter the finished water. Pretreatment should be considered for water with a high turbidity level.

    Bacteria also can be removed by microfiltration. Filters are typically rated absolute or nominal. An absolute rating is the size of a particle in micrometers (µm) that will pass through the filter. It is intended to represent the pore size opening in the filter media. The term “absolute” specifies that no particle larger than that rating will be able to pass through the filter. This limits the absolute rating to types of media with consistent pore size, which will show 100% retention of particles. A nominal rating refers to the pore size of the particulate; the filter media retains the majority of particulates (60 to 98%) at the specified pore size. While filters with low absolute ratings may aid in reducing bacteria, smaller viruses are more difficult to remove with filtration alone. Many times these filters include silver to inhibit further growth of bacteria or iodine to kill or inactivate any present bacteria or viruses.

    Removing bacteria from drinking water is imperative to protecting public health. Given better testing methods and further research, more bacteria are coming to light, such as Helicobacter pylori, Adenoviruses, Aeromonas hydrophila and Cyanobacteria. These are on the EPA’s Contaminant Candidate List for possible future regulation. Lack of clean drinking water is still a leading cause of death throughout the world. Proper disinfection and treatment are essential to protecting public health. Regular testing of drinking water is a good way to ensure that the treatment being used is effective and the water is free from microbial contamination.




    Marianne Metzger is an accounting specialist for Accent Control Systems, Inc. Metzger is a member of the Editorial Advisory Board of Water Quality Products. She can be reached at 610.630.7640, ext. 145, or by e-mail at mmetzger@accent-control.com.

    Source: Water Quality Products   March 2007   Volume: 12 Number: 3
    Copyright © 2012 Scranton Gillette Communications




    Advertise with us
    Learn about our online marketing opportunities.
    Home   |   Advertising   |   News Search   |   Articles   |   Buyer's Guide   |   Career Center   |   Case Histories   |   Top of Page   |  
    Share |